President Donald Trump via an executive order titled Unleashing American Energy directed federal executive agencies to pause disbursement of funds appropriated by Biden-era energy, environmental, and infrastructure programs. The directive marks the first step of the Trump-Vance administration’s efforts to roll back the former administration’s climate programs, and it temporarily halts payments to companies that received awards supported by certain buckets of federal funds.
The executive order freezes expenditure of funds appropriated by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) or the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). During the freeze, agency heads are instructed to consider whether grants, loans, contracts, and other disbursements supported with those funds are consistent with the new administration’s energy policy. Before those funds can be disbursed again, agencies must follow a two-step process:
Companies receiving funding appropriated under the IRA or IIJA may see agencies pause their payments in response to the executive order as newly appointed agency heads conduct the review that this executive order prescribes.
However, a pause in payments may not mean that federal agencies will pause work or even permit a pause in work under agreements funded by the IRA or IIJA. A company’s particular obligations will depend on the nature and terms of their award. For instance, under a traditional procurement contract, contractors should generally continue performance absent a stop-work order received directly from the responsible contracting officer.
Under other types of funding agreements, it is less clear whether an agency will suspend the award during the disbursement pause or expect performance to continue. Companies may consider communicating with their funding agencies to confirm the status of disbursements for their individual awards and, if paused, discuss the path forward regarding performance.
In the event work continues during the payment pause, contractors and other types of award recipients may have a path forward that allows them to receive eventual payment for such work. However, whether the IRA or IIJA funding will be available will likely depend on whether the funded program is consistent with the Trump-Vance administration policy objectives described in the executive order. Additionally, the payment timeline for contractors and award recipients will likely depend on when—and if—the funding pause is lifted.
Finally, companies may have recourse if payments never come. For example, procurement contractors could consider remedies available under the Contract Disputes Act. Recipients of grants and other funding awards can also consider recourse available based on the terms of their agreements.
If work stops, funding recipients may face additional costs that are out of the scope of their initial award agreements, such as costs associated with pausing work or with early termination of supplier agreements. In the procurement context, those costs are arguably the result of a constructive change, and procurement contractors can turn to remedies in their contracts, such as the “Changes—Fixed Price” and “Changes—Cost Reimbursement” Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses. [1]
However, contractors should be mindful that those clauses impose tight timelines for companies to assert their right to an adjustment: contractors must give the government notice that they intend to pursue a claim “within 30 days” of an order from a contracting officer that creates a constructive change. Other clauses that may provide bases for remedies—such as the Government Delay of Work clause and the Stop Work Order clause—impose similarly short 20- and 30-day deadlines. [2]
If work stops due to funding agreements governed by the Super Circular, a consolidation of eight of OMB’s financial circulars, companies’ costs are generally allowable until an award is suspended or terminated. [3] That includes costs incurred by a company that are not incurred in anticipation of a suspension—and could potentially include costs associated with supplier agreements that were incurred before a suspension was anticipated. Once a suspension or termination occurs, costs are allowable only if they are permitted by the notice of suspension or termination.
Funding recipients should carefully document any costs they incur if and when payments pause and should closely review any suspension or termination notice they receive to see whether that notice provides for costs.
Visit our Trump-Vance Administration Policies and Priorities resource center and subscribe to our mailing list for the latest on programming, guidance, and current legal and business developments involving the Trump-Vance administration.
If you have any questions or would like more information on the issues discussed in this LawFlash, please contact any of the following: