The Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong (SFC) and the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong (Exchange) published on 18 October 2024 a Joint Statement on Enhanced Timeframe for New Listing Application Process. The initiatives contained in the joint statement provide more certainty as to the timeframe (the Enhanced Application Timeframe) required for an application to list new equity securities on the Exchange (a New Listing). Importantly, the SFC and Exchange expressed their wills to complete the New Listing application process within the six-month application validity window.
Under the dual filing system in Hong Kong, a listing applicant in a Hong Kong IPO will file its listing application with both the SFC and the Exchange. The filing of the listing application with the SFC is done through the Exchange, which serves as the frontline regulator to enforce the Listing Rules and makes decisions under the Listing Rules concerning issues such as assessing eligibility for listing. The SFC, acting as the statutory regulator, oversees the Securities and Futures (Stock Market Listing) Rules (SMLR) and the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO). Both the SFC and the Exchange will review New Listing applications and raise comments and queries on the listing application.
While the dual filing system remains, the Enhanced Application Timeframe will provide a greater degree of certainty in terms of the timeline:
Specifically for companies listed on either the Shanghai or Shenzhen stock exchange (A-share Listed Companies), the Enhanced Application Timeframe provides an accelerated timeframe for the New Listing application process (the Accelerated Timeframe):
If the SFC and/or the Exchange has material concerns regarding an applicant’s compliance with the SFO, the SMLR and/or the Listing Rules, the quality of listing document preparation, or if there are new material developments or incomplete responses to the regulators’ comments, the timeline of the application process may be lengthened. After the issue of the first comment letter, the SFC and the Exchange, where necessary, will engage with the key representatives of the applicant and its sponsor, as well as other advisers, to facilitate their understanding of the material regulatory concerns and outline the regulators’ expectations on their subsequent responses.
If any subsequent responses to the regulatory comments are materially incomplete, the applicant and its sponsor will be informed of the deficiency and the vetting process suspended until a complete and satisfactory reply is received. If the applicant and its sponsor do not adequately address the material regulatory concerns after two rounds of regulatory comments (or one round under the Accelerated Timeframe), a direct requisition letter will be issued under the SMLR and/or a major concerns letter as appropriate. The progress of the application will then be subject to the applicant and its sponsor satisfactorily addressing the material regulatory concerns set out in the SMLR Letter and/or the major concerns letter.
If you have any questions or would like more information on the issues discussed in this LawFlash, please contact any of the following: