The Biden administration continues to navigate the intricate course between fostering domestic solar manufacturing and countering perceived unfair trade practices by China. In a series of strategic maneuvers, the administration recently announced significant changes to the tariff structure under Sections 201 and 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, with the aim of bolstering the US solar manufacturing sector and safeguarding American jobs and businesses.
Concurrently, the expiration in June 2024 of the 24-month presidential moratorium on new tariffs for the importation of solar panels into the United States as well as a new antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) case initiated against solar panels from four Southeast Asian countries (accounting for a predominant portion of the exports of solar panels to the United States) may create further instability in solar panel import pricing.
In response to the Office of the US Trade Representative’s recommendation to “enhanc[e] the effectiveness of the tariff actions by adding or increasing section 301 tariffs on certain products in strategic sectors,” US President Joseph Biden issued a memorandum on May 14, 2024 directing the US Trade Representative to increase tariffs in 2024, 2025, and 2026 on $18 billion worth of imports from China, with a focus on solar cells and modules. The tariffs on these critical components will double from 25% to 50%, a move designed to protect domestic manufacturers from what the administration deems as unfair trade practices by Chinese companies.
The Trade Representative proposes that increases in 2024 be effective as of August 1, 2024, with the 2025 and 2026 increases becoming effective on January 1 of the corresponding year. The Trade Representative also proposes to modify the actions by granting 19 temporary exclusions for certain solar manufacturing equipment. The products subject to these proposed modifications and products being proposed for the exclusion process are set out in annexes to the Trade Representative’s notice.
The Trade Representative also proposed raising import tariffs on battery cells from China used in electric vehicles (EVs) and energy storage systems. Tariffs for EV battery cells will increase to 25% in 2024, with energy storage tariffs following suit in 2026, with the goal of leveling the playing field for US manufacturers that have long been undercut by cheaper imports.
A notable pivot in policy is the imminent removal of the bifacial module exclusion under Section 201. Bifacial solar panels, which are predominantly used in utility-scale projects, have enjoyed an exclusion from safeguard tariffs. This exclusion, implemented during the previous administration, has led to a surge in imports, undermining the efficacy of the Section 201 safeguard measures. The Biden administration’s decision to eliminate this exclusion seeks to restore the protective intent of the original tariffs, granting US manufacturers a stronger shield against unfair competition.
In addition, the administration has announced the end of the temporary “solar bridge,” which facilitated duty-free imports from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. This measure, initially intended to support the ramp-up of domestic solar manufacturing, concluded on June 6, 2024, and producers in Southeast Asia that have been found to be circumventing AD/CVD on solar manufacturers from China will be subject to duties unless they have modified their manufacturing process to conform to the new certification requirements.
Concurrently, the administration has announced it will crack down on stockpiling practices by enforcing a 180-day installation requirement for duty-free imported panels. US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will rigorously monitor compliance, necessitating detailed certifications from importers. Earlier in 2024, CBP began issuing questionnaires to solar companies requesting extensive disclosures about the source of modules, panels, and other products.
One day after the Biden administration announced the increased tariffs, and in response to a petition filed by the American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing Trade Committee, the US Department of Commerce (Commerce) announced on May 15, 2024 the start of AD/CVD investigations into crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells—whether or not assembled into modules—originating from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. And, on June 7, 2024 the US International Trade Commission found that there is a reasonable indication that US solar industry is “materially injured” or “threatened with material injury” by such imports.
The below table sets out the anticipated schedule of deadlines:
EVENT |
AD INVESTIGATIONS |
CVD INVESTIGATIONS |
Petition(s) Filed |
April 24, 2024 |
April 24, 2024 |
Commerce Initiation Date |
May 14, 2024 |
May 14, 2024 |
ITC Preliminary Determinations |
June 7, 2024 |
June 7, 2024 |
Commerce Preliminary Determinations |
October 1, 2024 |
July 18, 2024 |
Commerce Final Determinations |
December 16, 2024 |
October 1, 2024 |
ITC Final Determinations |
January 30, 2025 |
November 15, 2024 |
Issuance of Orders |
February 6, 2025 |
November 22, 2024 |
These deadlines may be extended under the statute.
The Department of Energy (DOE) and Commerce will also intensify monitoring of solar module import patterns, particularly from Southeast Asia, where Chinese manufacturers have been found circumventing AD/CVD. This vigilance aims to prevent market oversaturation and ensure a fair competitive environment for US producers.
To further incentivize domestic production, the US Department of Treasury has issued new guidance on the domestic content bonus under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. This bonus rewards developers that source materials such as iron, steel, and manufactured products domestically. The updated guidance includes an elective safe harbor, allowing developers to rely on DOE-provided default cost percentages to determine eligibility, thereby simplifying compliance and fostering greater domestic partnerships.
Moreover, the DOE is investing more than $70 million in R&D to support new technologies in the solar supply chain. This funding, part of the president’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, will address key gaps and promote innovations in solar wafer and cell manufacturing, opening new markets for advanced solar technologies.
To support continued growth in US solar manufacturing, the administration will manage the current 5-gigawatt tariff-rate quota for imported solar cells under Section 201. Should imports approach this quota, it will be raised by an additional 7.5 gigawatts to ensure a steady supply for domestic module manufacturing.
Given these sweeping changes, renewable energy developers and stakeholders must navigate this new regulatory environment with careful attention.
Here are five key takeaways to ensure compliance and strategic alignment:
The recent regulatory changes present both challenges and opportunities for solar developers. By proactively assessing the impact of increased tariffs, diversifying supplier networks, and leveraging domestic content bonuses, developers can navigate these changes effectively.
Immediate action to review procurement agreements and secure necessary supplies will be crucial to mitigate risks and capitalize on the incentives available under the Inflation Reduction Act. As the clean energy landscape continues to evolve, staying informed and adaptable will be key to maintaining a competitive edge in the burgeoning US solar market.