As Prescribed

While audits are part of doing business in the ordinary course, businesses are generally less than eager to open the books. And the same is true when it comes to the 340B Drug Pricing Program. Audits are now making the list of ongoing disputes between manufacturers and covered entities (CEs) participating in the program.

Recognizing the importance of diversity and inclusivity in clinical trials, drug development, and regulatory decision-making, Congress amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) in connection with the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act (FDORA) provisions of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, requiring sponsors of certain clinical studies of drugs, biological products, and medical devices to submit Diversity Action Plans to the FDA (FDCA Sections 505(z) and 520(g)(9)).

In what can only be characterized as a necessary but significant proposed departure from current political initiatives focused on lowering pharmaceutical drug prices, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) proposes considerably increasing reimbursement for certain qualified diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals.

Medicare Part B enrollees as of July 1, 2024 will experience savings on coinsurance for 64 drugs selected by the Biden administration. Pursuant to the Inflation Reduction Act and its Medicare Prescription Drug Inflation Rebate Program, these select drugs will have a lower coinsurance rate through September 30, 2024 to adjust for drug prices rising faster than the rate of inflation. The anticipated savings are substantial, especially with more than 750,000 Medicare beneficiaries using these drugs annually and another 300,000 individuals qualifying for expanded benefits under the Low Income Subsidy program.

Taking a step toward fulfilling its requirements under Section 506K of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Section 506K), FDA has issued Draft Guidance describing how the agency intends to implement the Platform Technology Designation Program. Section 506K was established by Section 2503 of the Prepare for and Respond to Existing Viruses, Emerging New Threats, and Pandemics Act of 2022 and enacted as part of the 2023 Consolidated Appropriations Act.

Pharmaceutical drug pricing and reimbursement continues to make headlines nationwide. In a recent development, Maryland’s Prescription Drug Affordability Board (PDAB) finalized its list of selected drugs for affordability review. The board will engage in what it contends will be a comprehensive “cost review” where it will seek public comments, additional information, and data over a 60-day period to determine if the selected drugs will be subject to state-prescribed upper payment limits.

In what is being touted as a significant win for pharmaceutical drug manufacturers, the DC Circuit affirmed on May 21, 2024 that Section 340B of the Public Health Service Act does not categorically prohibit manufacturers from imposing distribution restrictions on covered drugs to covered entities. By rejecting the US government’s position that the 340B Drug Pricing Program categorically prohibits manufacturers from imposing any contractual conditions on the distribution of covered outpatient drugs, the court opened the door for new contract relationships between program manufacturers and covered entities.

At a time when pharmaceutical drug prices are at the height of political scrutiny, manufacturers can breathe a small sigh of relief as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced on May 15, 2024 that it will not, at this time, finalize its best price stacking provision in its May 23, 2023 Medicaid Drug Rebate Program (MDRP) proposed rule.

On May 21, 2024, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) issued a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register (FR) to reschedule marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). This announcement comes nearly a year after the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) August 29, 2023 letter to the DEA recommending that marijuana be rescheduled. It also follows an April 11, 2024 opinion letter from the DOJ Office of Legal Counsel that the United States' international treaty obligations do not prevent rescheduling marijuana. The proposed rule represents the most significant policy shift for marijuana since the passage of the CSA in 1970, which categorized marijuana as a Schedule I controlled substance.

Pharmaceutical drug pricing and reimbursement remains a bipartisan focus as we draw closer to the November presidential elections, with politicians remaining steadfast in their efforts to turn up the heat on pharmaceutical manufacturers. Politicians and other groups from across the political spectrum have coalesced around a 40-year-old statute known as the Bayh-Dole Act—intended to facilitate the public’s beneficial use of patented inventions by securing intellectual property (IP) rights for inventors—and are seeking to transform the statute’s never-before-used “march-in” rights to influence the price of drug products.