Leonard Impagliazzo IV
Leonard Impagliazzo advises clients at the intersection of complex litigation, data, and emerging technology. His practice focuses on eDiscovery, internal investigations, information governance, and data privacy, with particular emphasis on large-scale disputes and investigations. He develops practical and defensible strategies for the preservation, collection, review, privilege analysis, and production of electronically stored information (ESI), helping clients manage legal risk, cost, and operational complexity.
Leonard has experience supporting intellectual property, product liability, toxic tort, commercial, and white collar matters in US federal and state courts. He also advises clients in the manufacturing, healthcare, pharmaceutical, software, social media, energy, and investment sectors on legal, technical, and strategic issues involving large and complex data populations.
A significant part of Leonard’s practice focuses on data preservation, litigation holds, spoliation, forensic remediation, and related discovery issues. He helps clients and litigation teams assess legal, factual, forensic, and practical considerations when preservation or collection issues arise and develops defensible strategies for remediation, discovery negotiations, and related litigation positions, including potential discovery sanctions. He also regularly drafts and negotiates ESI protocols, protective orders, privilege logging procedures, search methodologies, and other discovery processes designed to support defensible collection and preservation.
Leonard designs and implements technology-enabled review strategies using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), technology-assisted review (TAR), clustering, concept searching, and other advanced analytics. He has experience evaluating, implementing, and optimizing AI-assisted review workflows across high-volume litigation, investigations, and document reviews, including multidistrict litigation. His work includes developing methodologies to assess when GenAI-assisted review is appropriate for a matter, projecting efficiencies relative to traditional review, and integrating AI tools into defensible discovery workflows. He also develops layered review strategies that combine TAR, GenAI, and other advanced technologies to reduce manual review and identify new applications for AI reasoning, summarization, and citation capabilities. He advises clients and case teams on tool selection, workflow design, validation, defensibility, and the integration of emerging technologies into litigation and investigation strategy, with an emphasis on data minimization, accuracy, efficiency, and cost control.
Leonard leads discovery teams and coordinates lawyers, project managers, forensic professionals, vendors, and other technical resources across individual matters and portfolios of related litigation. Drawing on more than a decade of experience with high-volume and time-sensitive matters, he develops discovery strategies that account for litigation objectives, risk, budget, staffing, deadlines, technology, and client priorities.
Leonard is also an active contributor to the eDiscovery and legal technology community, regularly writing and speaking on the practical and legal implications of emerging technologies. His publications and presentations address topics including generative AI, eDiscovery case law, novel litigation and discovery challenges, internal investigations, privilege, mobile-device discovery, information governance, and evolving obligations associated with ESI. Leonard also maintains an active pro bono practice. He represented a Honduran woman and her minor son before the Philadelphia Immigration Court, securing withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture.
- Advised a Fortune 100 pharmaceutical company in high-stakes multidistrict litigation and related state-court actions, including negotiating ESI protocols, privilege logging procedures, protective orders, and review strategies designed to promote consistency across related matters
- Advised a technology company in mass arbitration proceedings on complex issues involving data preservation, collection, review, privilege, and production
- Developed and implemented discovery strategies in contentious matters involving preservation, forensic issues, search methodology, technology-assisted review, nontraditional data sources, and extensive discovery negotiations
- Managed discovery strategy across portfolios of related matters, including supervising attorney and project-management teams, coordinating technical resources, and developing scalable workflows tailored to individual matter requirements
- Designed and implemented an internal-investigation reporting model for an energy-sector client that enabled the identification and analysis of key information across more than 400,000 records within approximately a day and a half
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
- Widener University School of Law, 2009, J.D.
- Temple University, 2007, B.B.A.
- Pennsylvania
- New Jersey
- US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, Ones to Watch, Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants, Philadelphia (2026, 2027)
Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, Ones to Watch, Product Liability Litigation - Defendants, Philadelphia (2026, 2027)
Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, Ones to Watch, Privacy and Data Security Law, Philadelphia (2024–2027)
Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, Ones to Watch, Technology Law, Philadelphia (2024–2027)
No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. A description of the selection methodology for the above awards can be found here.