Going beyond the basics of artificial intelligence (AI), it is important to focus on the data. How data is used, managed, and understood in the context of AI has become the center of many legal and business conversations, particularly as AI technologies are increasingly integrated into products and services. In this environment, data is not just a resource, it is the lifeblood of AI, influencing everything from product development to risk mitigation.
Initial Concerns
The focus originally was education—how AI works, its potential risks, and its impact on business processes. Legal teams and IT departments were especially concerned with understanding the technology's limitations and risks, such as biases in data processing and potential compliance issues.
Development of AI Usage Policies
As businesses began to adopt AI, the need for formal AI usage policies emerged. These policies helped organizations regulate how AI could be used, setting boundaries, especially in customer data processing.
Shifting Focus to Use Cases
Over time, AI projects began to transition from high-level risk assessments to more practical applications, such as framing specific use cases for AI and negotiating the terms for integrating AI into business processes. Companies were focusing on how to use AI effectively and responsibly, including understanding what AI models (like large language models, or LLMs) can and cannot do.
From Risk to Negotiation
The focus shifted from simply advising businesses about risks to negotiating deals that define data usage rights and responsibilities. Negotiations around AI contracts began to revolve around how data would be used, how AI models would process it, and who would be accountable if something went wrong.
With the growing reliance on AI, it is important that businesses address contractual issues to protect their interests and manage risk.
Responsibility to Test AI
Of the most pressing issues companies face is ensuring that AI models are tested for accuracy and reliability. Contracts should include provisions that hold the vendor accountable for testing AI to ensure it meets the following criteria:
Customer Concerns
Customers are focused on understanding what data is used in AI models, how it is processed, and whether the output meets specific standards. If the AI system uses biased or flawed data, the customer could face legal and reputational risks. Therefore, contracts for products or services that incorporate AI should be explicit about data rights, transparency, and accuracy.
Vendor Considerations
Vendors may already have their own policies or principles, whether published or provided during negotiations. Customers should ensure that these policies align with their standards and expectations.
The landscape of AI is rapidly evolving, and regulatory frameworks are starting to catch up. Jurisdictions worldwide, including those in both the United States and European Union, are introducing laws and frameworks.
Regulatory Frameworks
In the US, federal and state regulations are increasingly focused on the role of AI in business decisions and operations. Similarly, the EU AI Act and regulations in the United Kingdom emphasize the need for businesses to understand the implications of AI in decision-making processes.
Key Principles of AI
The key principles of AI include the following:
Implementing AI successfully requires careful planning, risk assessments, and continuous monitoring, all tailored to the specific needs of the business.
Some key steps to manage risks include the following:
Businesses need to understand that AI is no longer just a concept, but rather a central component of modern operations. The way data is used and managed in AI systems will play a critical role in ensuring success. Businesses should consider the following takeaways: